Wednesday, December 31, 2008

"Why I Am a Socialist" -- Chris Hedges, Dec 29, 2008



Why I Am a Socialist Posted on Dec 29, 2008

By Chris Hedges

The corporate forces that are looting the Treasury and have plunged us
into a depression will not be contained by the two main political
parties. The Democratic and Republican parties have become little more
than squalid clubs of privilege and wealth, whores to money and
corporate interests, hostage to a massive arms industry, and so adept at
deception and self-delusion they no longer know truth from lies. We will
either find our way out of this mess by embracing an uncompromising
democratic socialism-one that will insist on massive government relief
and work programs, the nationalization of electricity and gas companies,
a universal, not-for-profit government health care program, the
outlawing of hedge funds, a radical reduction of our bloated military
budget and an end to imperial wars-or we will continue to be fleeced and
impoverished by our bankrupt elite and shackled and chained by our
surveillance state.

The free market and globalization, promised as the route to worldwide
prosperity, have been exposed as a con game. But this does not mean our
corporate masters will disappear. Totalitarianism, as George Orwell
pointed out, is not so much an age of faith as an age of schizophrenia.
?A society becomes totalitarian when its structure becomes flagrantly
artificial,? Orwell wrote, ?that is when its ruling class has lost
its function but succeeds in clinging to power by force or fraud.?
Force and fraud are all they have left. They will use both.

There is a political shift in Europe toward an open confrontation with
the corporate state. Germany has seen a surge of support for Die Linke
(The Left), a political grouping formed 18 months ago. It is co-led by
the veteran socialist ?Red? Oskar Lafontaine, who has built his
career on attacking big business. Two-thirds of Germans in public
opinion polls say they agree with all or some of Die Linke?s platform.
The Socialist Party of the Netherlands is on the verge of overtaking the
Labor Party as the main opposition party on the left. Greece, beset with
street protests and violence by disaffected youths, has seen the rapid
rise of the Coalition of the Radical Left. In Spain and Norway
socialists are in power. Resurgence is not universal, especially in
France and Britain, but the shifts toward socialism are significant.

Corporations have intruded into every facet of life. We eat corporate
food. We buy corporate clothes. We drive corporate cars. We buy our
vehicular fuel and our heating oil from corporations. We borrow from
corporate banks. We invest our retirement savings with corporations. We
are entertained, informed and branded by corporations. We work for
corporations. The creation of a mercenary army, the privatization of
public utilities and our disgusting for-profit health care system are
all legacies of the corporate state. These corporations have no loyalty
to America or the American worker. They are not tied to nation states.
They are vampires.

?By now the [commercial] revolution has deprived the mass of
consumers of any independent access to the staples of life: clothing,
shelter, food, even water,? Wendell Berry wrote in ?The Unsettling
of America.? ?Air remains the only necessity that the average user
can still get for himself, and the revolution had imposed a heavy tax on
that by way of pollution. Commercial conquest is far more thorough and
final than military defeat.?

The corporation is designed to make money without regard to human life,
the social good or impact on the environment. Corporate laws impose a
legal duty on corporate executives to make as much money as possible for
shareholders, although many have moved on to fleece shareholders as
well. In the 2003 documentary film ?The Corporation? the management
guru Peter Drucker says: ?If you find an executive who wants to take
on social responsibilities, fire him. Fast.?

A corporation that attempts to engage in social responsibility, that
tries to pay workers a decent wage with benefits, that invests its
profits to protect the environment and limit pollution, that gives
consumers fair deals, can be sued by shareholders. Robert Monks, the
investment manager, says in the film: ?The corporation is an
externalizing machine, in the same way that a shark is a killing
machine. There isn?t any question of malevolence or of will. The
enterprise has within it, and the shark has within it, those
characteristics that enable it to do that for which it was designed.?
Ray Anderson, the CEO of Interface Corp., the world?s largest
commercial carpet manufacturer, calls the corporation a ?present day
instrument of destruction? because of its compulsion to ?externalize
any cost that an unwary or uncaring public will allow it to
externalize.?

?The notion that we can take and take and take and take, waste and
waste, without consequences, is driving the biosphere to destruction,?
Anderson says.

In short, the film, based on Joel Bakan?s book ?The Corporation:
The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power,? asserts that the
corporation exhibits many of the traits found in people clinically
defined as psychopaths.

Psychologist Dr. Robert Hare lists in the film psychopathic traits and
ties them to the behavior of corporations:

callous unconcern for the feelings for others; incapacity to maintain
enduring relationships; reckless disregard for the safety of others;
deceitfulness: repeated lying and conning others for profit; incapacity
to experience guilt; failure to conform to social norms with respect to
lawful behavior.

And yet, under the American legal system, corporations have the same
legal rights as individuals. They give hundreds of millions of dollars
to political candidates, fund the army of some 35,000 lobbyists in
Washington and thousands more in state capitals to write corporate-
friendly legislation, drain taxpayer funds and abolish government
oversight. They saturate the airwaves, the Internet, newsprint and
magazines with advertisements promoting their brands as the friendly
face of the corporation. They have high-priced legal teams, millions of
employees, skilled public relations firms and thousands of elected
officials to ward off public intrusions into their affairs or halt messy
lawsuits. They hold a near monopoly on all electronic and printed
sources of information. A few media giants-AOL-Time Warner, General
Electric, Viacom, Disney and Rupert Murdoch?s NewsGroup- control
nearly everything we read, see and hear.

?Private capital tends to become concentrated in [a] few hands,
partly because of competition among the capitalists, and partly because
technological development and the increasing division of labor encourage
the formation of larger units of production at the expense of the
smaller ones,? Albert Einstein wrote in 1949 in the Monthly Review in
explaining why he was a socialist. ?The result of these developments
is an oligarchy of private capital the enormous power of which cannot be
effectively checked even by a democratically organized political
society. This is true since the members of legislative bodies are
selected by political parties, largely financed or otherwise influenced
by private capitalists who, for all practical purposes, separate the
electorate from the legislature. The consequence is that the
representatives of the people do not in fact sufficiently protect the
interests of the underprivileged sections of the population. Moreover,
under existing conditions, private capitalists inevitably control,
directly or indirectly, the main sources of information (press, radio,
education). It is thus extremely difficult, and indeed in most cases
quite impossible, for the individual citizen to come to objective
conclusions and to make intelligent use of his political rights.?

Labor and left-wing activists, especially university students and well-
heeled liberals, have failed to unite. This division, which is often
based on social rather than economic differences, has long stymied
concerted action against ruling elites. It has fractured the American
left and rendered it impotent.

?Large sections of the middle class are being gradually
proletarianized; but the important point is that they do not, at any
rate not in the first generation, adopt a proletarian outlook,? Orwell
wrote in 1937 during the last economic depression. ?Here I am, for
instance, with a bourgeois upbringing and a working-class income. Which
class do I belong to? Economically I belong to the working class, but it
is almost impossible for me to think of myself as anything but a member
of the bourgeoisie. And supposing I had to take sides, whom should I
side with, the upper class which is trying to squeeze me out of
existence, or the working class whose manners are not my manners? It is
probable that I, personally, in any important issue, would side with the
working class. But what about the tens or hundreds of thousands of
others who are in approximately the same position? And what about that
far larger class, running into millions this time-the office-workers and
black-coated employees of all kinds- whose traditions are less definite
middle class but who would certainly not thank you if you called them
proletarians? All of these people have the same interests and the same
enemies as the working class. All are being robbed and bullied by the
same system. Yet how many of them realize it? When the pinch came nearly
all of them would side with their oppressors and against those who ought
to be their allies. It is quite easy to imagine a working class crushed
down to the worst depths of poverty and still remaining bitterly
anti-working- class in sentiment; this being, of course, a ready-made
Fascist party.?

Coalitions of environmental, anti-nuclear, anti-capitalist,
sustainable-agriculture and anti-globalization forces have coalesced in
Europe to form and support socialist parties. This has yet to happen in
the United States. The left never rallied in significant numbers behind
Cynthia McKinney or Ralph Nader. In picking the lesser of two evils, it
threw its lot in with a Democratic Party that backs our imperial wars,
empowers the national security state and does the bidding of
corporations.

If Barack Obama does not end the flagrant theft of taxpayer funds by
corporate slugs and the disgraceful abandonment of our working class,
especially as foreclosures and unemployment mount, many in the country
will turn in desperation to the far right embodied by groups such as
Christian radicals. The failure by the left to offer a democratic
socialist alternative will mean there will be, in the eyes of many
embittered and struggling working- and middle-class Americans, no
alternative but a perverted Christian fascism. The inability to
articulate a viable socialism has been our gravest mistake. It will
ensure, if this does not soon change, a ruthless totalitarian
capitalism.

Tuesday, December 30, 2008

We must pass the Employee Free Choice Act

from: PWW

Author: Seth Michaels, AFL-CIO Blog
People's Weekly World Newspaper, 12/29/08 10:51




Original source: AFL-CIO Now
In today’s New York Times, the editorial board makes a strong, clearly argued and unambiguous case that President-elect Obama needs to strengthen working families by pushing for a quick passage of the Employee Free Choice Act and giving his Labor Secretary-designate, Rep. Hilda Solis, the power she needs to protect workers.

The editorial lays out several challenges ahead for Obama, Solis and the fight to defend workers’ freedom to form unions and bargain. Giving workers the power to improve their own lives and the support they need in the administration must be a top priority if we are to restore an economy that works for everyone.

Here’s what the Times has to say about the Employee Free Choice Act, which Obama and Solis both co-sponsored in Congress:

The measure is vital legislation and should not be postponed. Even modest increases in the share of the unionized labor force push wages upward, because nonunion workplaces must keep up with unionized ones that collectively bargain for increases. By giving employees a bigger say in compensation issues, unions also help to establish corporate norms, the absence of which has contributed to unjustifiable disparities between executive pay and rank-and-file pay.

As The New York Times aptly points out, the corporate argument that giving more workers the freedom to form unions and bargain will hurt a declining economy is exactly backwards. Indeed, as we’ve often noted, the current economic weakness is due to the fact that for far too long, workers have had less and less power to bargain for better wages, benefits and job security.

There is a strong argument that the slack labor market of a recession actually makes unions all the more important. Without a united front, workers will have even less bargaining power in the recession than they had during the growth years of this decade, when they largely failed to get raises even as productivity and profits soared. If paycontinues to lag, it will only prolong the downturn by inhibiting spending.

The editorial also makes a strong case for giving Solis–described as an “unfailing advocate for workers’ rights” and a leader on issues affecting working families–the ability to reverse the Bush administration’s years of short-sighted and anti-worker rulings on workplace safety, overtime and other key issues.

AFL-CIO Blog

Monday, December 29, 2008

Vice premier: China urges immediate stop of military operations in Gaza

from: People's Daily Online

December 29, 2008

Related News
Israel reopens crossings to allow truckloads of humanitarian supplies into Gaza
Egyptian aid convoy enters Gaza
Ship protesting Gaza blockage to sail from Lebanon in Jan.
Gaza Christians cancel Christmas celebrations to protest blockade
Egypt briefly opens borders with Gaza





China urges parties concerned to immediate stop the military operations in the Gaza Strip, and take effective measures to ease the tension, visiting Chinese Vice Premier Li Keqiang said in Kuwait City Sunday.

Li, who is paying a four-day official visit to Kuwait, exchanged views with Emir of Kuwait Sheikh Sabah al-Ahmad al-Jaberal-Sabah on the situation in Gaza after Israel carried out massive air strikes against dozens of targets in Gaza early Saturday.

Early on Sunday Israel continued airstrikes on different targets belong to Islamic Hamas movement and its government in the Gaza Strip, leaving 271 people killed and several hundred injured since Saturday, in response to Hamas ongoing cross-border rockets attacks.

Li said China is shocked and serious concerned about the current military operations in Gaza which caused heavy casualties.

He said the Middle East peace process has drawn worldwide attention, and the international community has put great efforts to solve the issue. However, the parties concerned used force to solve their differences and caused heavy civilian casualties. "This runs counter to the efforts made by the international community."

The Chinese vice premier urged the two sides, Israel and the Palestinians, mainly Hamas, to resolve their differences through dialogue and realize peace and stability in the Middle East as early as possible.

Li stressed that China, as one of the permanent members of the UN, has always been concerned about and supports the Middle East peace process.

"China supports the efforts made by all parties, especially the Arab countries, to realize a comprehensive, just peace in the region," he said.

Emir Al-Sabah expressed deep regret over the consequences of the incident. He said he appreciates China's just position on the Middle East issue, and hopes to work with China to ease the current tensions and promote peace in the region.

Li pays the visit to Kuwait at the invitation of Kuwaiti First Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Defense Sheikh Jaber MubarakAl-Hamad Al-Sabah.

Kuwait is the final leg of Li's 11-day overseas visit, his first foreign visit since he took office as vice premier in March, which has already taken him to Indonesia and Egypt.

Source: Xinhua

Calls grow for U.S. action on Gaza ceasefire

from: PWW

Author: Susan Webb
People's Weekly World Newspaper, 12/29/08 15:05



As the United Nations Security Council called for an immediate Gaza ceasefire, Jewish and Arab American groups urged the Bush administration and other nations to act to stop the escalating violence.

The American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee said “all parties directly involved” must “immediately work to end hostilities on all sides and arrive at a new ceasefire agreement.” The ADC called on the U.S. government to “exert immediate pressure on its ally Israel to halt attacks on Gaza's population.”

J Street, the Jewish American lobbying group, began a petition campaign demanding that the United States “intervene to bring about an immediate resumption of the ceasefire between Israel and Hamas.”

The Jewish group, which advocates for a two-state solution, called for “immediate and strong U.S.-led diplomatic efforts to urgently reinstate a meaningful ceasefire that ends all military operations, stops the rockets aimed at Israel and lifts the blockade of Gaza. This is in the best interests of Israel, the Palestinian people and the United States.”

The Israeli aerial bombing of densely populated Gaza, which began Dec. 27, is reported to have killed more than 300 people and injured well over 1,000, including children. A UN aid official on Saturday called the humanitarian crisis there “absolutely disastrous,” CNN reported.

“Similar attacks in the past have failed to make Israeli citizens any safer and resulted in increased support of Hamas extremists,” the ADC noted.

During the ceasefire that began this past summer, rocket attacks by Hamas had greatly diminished, the American Arab group pointed out. But, although Israel relaxed its blockade of Gaza slightly, it never ended the blockade. Israel escalated the situation in early November by killing 4 Palestinians in Gaza, in the bloodiest violation of the ceasefire, the ADC said. “The month that followed brought a return of a suffocating siege on the civilians of Gaza and rocket attacks against southern Israel.”

The tightened Israeli blockade left many of Gaza's 1.5-million inhabitants without sufficient food, water, fuel or medicine. More than half of Gaza’s population is under the age of 16. The UN has listed Gaza as the most densely populated area in the world with a population density that is higher than that of Manhattan in New York City.

Before the current Israeli attacks, the ADC said, over 850 Palestinians had been killed by Israel since the 2007 Annapolis summit, compared to fewer than 20 Israelis killed by rocket fire from Gaza since 2000. “The disproportionate nature of this latest round of violence … continues to fan the flames of discontent in the Arab and Muslim worlds,” the group said.

The Bush administration thus far has expressed uncritical support for the Israeli airstrikes. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice on Saturday blamed Hamas alone for the renewal of violence in Gaza. White House spokesperson Gordon Johndroe said, "These people are nothing but thugs, so Israel is going to defend its people against terrorists like Hamas that indiscriminately kill their own people."

The ADC criticized the Bush administration’s response for placing “all blame on Hamas with no mention of Israel's disproportionate and continuing bombardment of Gaza.”

The administration’s stance “ignored American national and economic interests in addition to international humanitarian law and the laws of war,” the ADC said.

In an e-mail message to supporters, J Street’s Isaac Luria wrote, “While there is nothing ‘right’ in raining rockets on Israeli families or dispatching suicide bombers, there is nothing ‘right’ in punishing a million and a half already-suffering Gazans for the actions of the extremists among them.

“The United States, the Quartet, and the world community must not wait — as they did in the Israel-Lebanon crisis of 2006 — for weeks to pass and hundreds or thousands more to die before intervening,” he continued. “There needs to be an urgent end to the new hostilities that brings a complete end to military operations, including an end to the rocket fire out of Gaza, and that allows food, fuel and other civilian necessities into Gaza.”

Luria added, “The need for diplomatic engagement goes beyond a short-term ceasefire. Eight years of the Bush administration's neglect and ineffective diplomacy have led us directly to a moment when the prospects for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict hang in the balance and with them the prospects for Israel's long-term survival.

“Following a renegotiated ceasefire, we urge the incoming Obama administration to lead an early and serious effort to achieve a comprehensive diplomatic resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian and Arab-Israeli conflicts.”

The ADC sent letters to President Bush, President-elect Obama, Secretary of State Rice, and the Israeli ambassador in Washington calling for an immediate end of hostilities on all sides.

The UN Security Council statement called on all parties to address "the serious humanitarian and economic needs in Gaza."

It urged them to take necessary measures, including opening border crossings, to ensure Gaza's people were supplied with food, fuel and medical treatment.

The council "stressed the need for the restoration of calm in full" to open the way for a Palestinian-Israeli political solution.

Other Jewish and Arab American groups that are calling for a renewed ceasefire include Brit Tzedek v’Shalom (Jewish Alliance for Peace and Justice), Jewish Voice for Peace and the American Task Force on Palestine.

suewebb @ pww.org

CPUSA condemns Gaza attacks

from: PWW

Author: Communist Party USA, www.cpusa.org
People's Weekly World Newspaper, 12/29/08 16:01



The Communist Party USA (CPUSA) emphatically condemns the continuing Israeli air strikes in Gaza, which have left hundreds dead and over a thousand wounded. The hundreds of Israeli air strikes have been carried out with a total disregard for the safety of civilians and institutions and are the latest phase in a campaign to blockade the economy of Gaza and deny the people access to basic necessities.

Israel's disproportionate response to the resumption of the Hamas rocket firings into Israel after the six-month ceasefire agreement expired, dramatically underscored the Bush administration's sidetracking of diplomatic efforts and negotiations. In fact, the US government has provided the basis for Israel's military action with continued military aid and supplies.

The Communist Party of Israel has suggested that the current Israeli attacks are a demagogic move related to the current electoral campaign in that country, as well as perhaps being intended to present the incoming Obama administration with a fait accompli, making it more difficult for Obama to adopt a new approach to the Israel-Palestine issue.

The CPUSA denounces the Bush administration for the verbal and material support it is now rendering to the Israeli aggression. We condemn all attacks on civilians whatever the cause or intention. We call on all peace-minded people in the U.S. to demand an end to the Israeli air strikes, end threats of a ground assault into Palestine, along with an end to Hamas rocket attacks, and to call on the incoming Obama administration to make a radical change in US policy on the Israel-Palestine issue, and to pressure the Israeli government to return to honest negotiations toward a two-state solution.

TAKE ACTION:

1. Contact the White House to protest the attack and demand emergency negotiations for an immediate cease-fire. Call 202-456-1111 or send an email to comments@whitehouse.gov.

2. Contact your Representative and Senators in Congress at 202-224-3121.

3. Call upon President-Elect Obama to pursue a new U.S. policy toward Israel/Palestine and send a message at www.change.gov

4. Join one of the many local actions protesting the assault on Gaza.

Israeli Communists condemn attacks on Gaza, call for ‘another direction’ toward peace

from: PWW

Author: Special to the World
People's Weekly World Newspaper, 12/28/08 15:35


The Communist Party of Israel and Hadash (the Democratic Front for Peace and Equality) condemned the deadly Dec. 27 attack by the Israeli Air Force on the Gaza Strip, which resulted in the killing of over 200 Palestinians.


In a statement issued the day of the massive airstrikes, the CPI called on communist and workers parties and social movements throughout the world to mobilize against what it termed “these Israeli war crimes” and called on the international community to “implement sanctions against Israel and indict Tzipi Livni, Ehud Barak and other Israeli political and military leadership for these blatant war crimes, committed as part of Israel's election process.”

The CPI said the attack on Gaza is part of the Israeli government’s ongoing siege of the Gaza Strip. “Israel is exploiting the last moments of the Bush administration to implement the deadly but ineffective imperialist policy of utilizing military force to effect political change,” the statement said.

It noted that demonstrations against the Israeli assault on the Gaza Strip were planned for Israel’s major cities, with demonstrations to be held that night in Tel Aviv, Haifa and Nazareth. The day before, hundreds of demonstrators attended a rally in central Tel Aviv to protest the expected Israeli military operation in response to Palestinian rocket attacks from Gaza. The rally was organized by the Coalition against the Gaza Siege and Hadash.

"I suggest that we go the other direction," said Hadash Knesset Member Dov Khenin, a leading member of the Communist Party of Israel. Israel’s power, he said, “is our tragedy. One powerful blow will not bring the end. [Hamas] will respond with rockets and eventually we'll embark on an all-out war. Going in the other direction means reinforcing the lull, securing a ceasefire, and lifting the siege that only serves to unite the population around Hamas.”

A genuine peace process has to engage the Palestinian Authority, led by Mahmoud Abbas, he said. “What's tragic here is that it's possible. We just need the desire.”

Khenin added that it is "essential to secure a prisoner swap that would include Gilad Shalit." When asked why few Israelis object to the war in Gaza, he responded: "People lost their hope. They realize that what's happening is bad, yet they think there's no other option. Yet we are not destined to be the victim of history."

Another rally participant, former Knesset Member Tamar Gozansky, also a leading member of the CPI, said, "Two years ago we protested at the same site, before the Second Lebanon War. We were ostracized and referred to as traitors. Yet several months later, all the people who made fun of us carried their own signs to Rabin Square and protested against Olmert's policy. I really hope that we won't have yet another reason to say: 'We told you so.'”

In an earlier statement, Khenin said, "A comprehensive war in Gaza is dangerous and unnecessary and will put the lives of thousands of Gazans and western Negev residents at risk."

“War is not the solution” to the problem of the Kassam rockets fired into Israel by Hamas, he continued. "There is another way: a real truce agreement. Not just a ceasefire, but also ending the Gaza blockade and easing the extreme suffering of a million and a half people."

Israeli strikes pound Gaza, kill 192

from: PWW

Author: Ibrahim Barzak
People's Weekly World Newspaper, 12/28/08 16:10



GAZA CITY, Gaza (AP) — Israeli warplanes retaliating for rocket fire from the Gaza Strip pounded dozens of security compounds across the Hamas-ruled territory in unprecedented waves of airstrikes Saturday, killing nearly 200 people and wounding 270 others in the single bloodiest day of fighting in years.

Most of those killed were security men, but civilians were also among the dead. Hamas said all of its security installations were hit and responded with several medium-range Grad rockets at Israel, reaching deeper than in the past. One Israeli was killed and at least four people were wounded in the rocket attacks. With so many wounded, the Palestinian death toll was likely to rise.

The air offensive followed weeks of intense Palestinian rocket and mortar fire on southern Israel, and Israeli leaders had issued increasingly tough warnings in recent days that they would not tolerate continued attacks.

Defense Minister Ehud Barak said Israel would expand the operation if necessary. "There is a time for calm and there is a time for fighting, and now is the time for fighting," he told a news conference. He would not comment when asked if a ground offensive was planned.

But asked earlier if Hamas political leaders might be targeted next, military spokeswoman Maj. Avital Leibovich said, "Any Hamas target is a target."

The strikes caused widespread panic and confusion in Gaza, as black clouds of smoke rose above the territory, ruled by Hamas for the past 18 months. Some of the Israeli missiles struck in densely populated areas as children were leaving school, and women rushed into the streets frantically looking for their children. Most of those killed were security men, but civilians were among the dead.

Said Masri sat in the middle of a Gaza City street, close to a security compound, alternately slapping his face and covering his head with dust from the bombed-out building.

"My son is gone, my son is gone," wailed Masri, 57. The shopkeeper said he sent his 9-year-old son out to purchase cigarettes minutes before the airstrikes began and now could not find him. "May I burn like the cigarettes, may Israel burn," Masri moaned.

In Gaza City's main security compound, bodies of more than a dozen uniformed security officers lay on the ground. One survivor raised his index finger in a show of Muslim faith, uttering a prayer. The Gaza police chief was among those killed. One man, his face bloodied, sat dazed on the ground as a fire raged nearby.

Later, some of the dead, rolled in blankets, were laid out on the floor of Gaza's main hospital for identification. Hamas police spokesman Ehad Ghussein said about 140 Hamas security forces were killed.

Israeli military officials said more than 100 tons of bombs were dropped on Gaza by mid-afternoon. They spoke on condition of anonymity under military guidelines.

Defiant Hamas leaders threatened revenge, including suicide attacks. Hamas "will continue the resistance until the last drop of blood," vowed spokesman Fawzi Barhoum.

Israel told its civilians near Gaza to take cover as militants began retaliating with rockets, and in the West Bank, moderate Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas called for restraint. Egypt summoned the Israeli ambassador to express condemnation and opened its border with Gaza to allow ambulances to drive out some of the wounded.

Israeli leaders approved military action against Gaza earlier in the week.

Past limited ground incursions and air strikes have not halted rocket barrages from Gaza. But with 200 mortars and rockets raining down on Israel since the truce expired a week ago, and 3,000 since the beginning of the year, according to the military's count, pressure had been mounting in Israel for the military to crush the gunmen.

Gaza militants fired 30 rockets and mortars Saturday after the air offensive began. A missile hit the town of Netivot, killing an Israeli man and wounding four people, rescue services said.

Dozens of stunned residents gathered around the house that took the deadly rocket hit. Many wept openly. The crowd broke up after an alert siren went off and sent the onlookers running.

Streets were nearly empty in Sderot, the Israeli border town that has been pummeled hardest by rockets. A few cars carried panicked residents leaving town. Dozens of people congregated on a hilltop to watch the Israeli aerial attacks.

Israel declared a state of emergency in Israeli communities within a 12-mile (20-kilometer) range of Gaza, putting the area on a war footing. A siren went off in Kiryat Gat, about 12 miles (20 kilometers) from the border, but early reports that the town was hit by a rocket for the first time were incorrect.

Barak, the Israeli defense minister, said the coming period "won't be easy" for southern Israel.

Protests against the campaign erupted in the Abbas-ruled West Bank and across the Arab world.

Several hundred angry Jordanians protested outside a UN complex in the capital Amman. "Hamas, go ahead. You are the cannon, we are the bullets," they cried, some waving the signature green Hamas banners.

In Ein Hilweh, a Palestinian refugee camp in Lebanon, dozens of youths hit the streets and set fire to tires. In Syria's al-Yarmouk camp, outside Damascus, dozens of Palestinian protesters vowed to continue fighting Israel.

The first round of air strikes on Gaza came just before noon.

Hospitals crowded with people, civilians rushing in wounded people in cars, vans and ambulances. "We are treating people on the floor, in the corridors. We have no more space. We don't know who is here or who to treat first," said one doctor who hung up the phone before identifying himself at Shifa Hospital, Gaza's main treatment center.

Dr. Moawiya Hassanain, a Gaza Health Ministry official, said at least 192 people were killed and 270 wounded. Frantic civilians drove wounded people to hospitals in their cars.

In the West Bank, Hamas' rival, Abbas, said in a statement that he "condemns this aggression" and called for restraint, according to an aide, Nabil Abu Rdeneh. Abbas, who has ruled only the West Bank since the Islamic Hamas seized power in Gaza in June 2007, was in contact with Arab leaders, and his West Bank Cabinet convened an emergency session.

Israel has targeted Gaza in the past, but the number of simultaneous attacks was unprecedented.

Israel left Gaza in 2005 after a 38-year occupation, but the withdrawal did not lead to better relations with Palestinians in the territory as Israeli officials had hoped.

Instead, the evacuation was followed by a sharp rise in militant attacks on Israeli border communities that on several occasions provoked harsh Israeli military reprisals.

The last, in late February and early March, spurred both sides to agree to a truce that was to have lasted six months but began unraveling in early November.

Sunday, December 28, 2008

Renegotiating NAFTA — an uphill but winnable fight

from: PWW

Author: Emile Schepers
People's Weekly World Newspaper, 12/22/08 08:59



One of the demands of U.S. workers in the election just past was a renegotiation of NAFTA. Canadian workers have similar concerns. In Mexico, the demand to reorganize NAFTA comes most strongly from small farmers, but is also advanced by workers and the left. It is a winnable, but uphill, fight.

When Obama takes office on Jan. 20, he will, ironically, be the most left-wing head of government of the three NAFTA countries, and the only one of the three who has said anything about renegotiating the terms of the pact.

Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, of the Conservative Party, is a fanatical free trader, and the right wing in Canada has issued dire threats that if Obama tries to reopen NAFTA, Canada will use the opportunity to demand increased prices for Canadian raw materials.

Mexican president Felipe Calderon, of the right-wing National Action Party (PAN), has not thought twice about hurting the poorest farmers and workers in his own country rather than violate the “principles” of "free" trade in foodstuffs. As a result of his policies and those of his immediate predecessors, living standards Mexico were already plunging before the recent financial crisis, which is striking Mexico with brutal force.

Calderon was elected in 2006 in a very fishy election, narrowly defeating a left-leaning, NAFTA-critical candidate, Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador of the Revolutionary Democratic Party (PRD). But the next presidential election under Mexican law is not until 2012. There are congressional elections on July 1, 2009, but the main left-center opposition party, the PRD, is in utter disarray from infighting.

In Canada, Harper’s Conservatives failed in October to get an absolute majority in Parliament, but remain in power anyway.

Fortunately in each of the three NAFTA countries, the governments are not going to have the only say.

Mexican small farmers and workers are worried that NAFTA undermines agriculture and manufacturing. Subsidized U.S. and Canadian products, especially grains, have driven farmers off the land by the millions, and U.S.-based monopolies such as Wal-Mart have taken over many other areas of the Mexican economy, undermining the country’s economic sovereignty and drastically eliminating the total number of jobs available. In several Mexican states, remittances from Mexican immigrants in the United States now exceed the total income from wages and salaries by up to 50 percent. But the remittances, which peaked in 2007 at about $24 billion, now are dropping sharply, because Mexican immigrant workers are being laid off or paid less due to the financial crisis.

Over the last couple of years there have been anti-NAFTA protests in Mexico, mostly organized by farmers. There has been some support for this movement from the most progressive sectors of Mexican labor, which will likely grow as the financial crisis deepens.

In the United States and Canada, workers and their unions are concerned about job flight under NAFTA. This facilitated Obama’s and the Democrats’ victories in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan and other crucial Northern manufacturing states, and the pressure for opening up the NAFTA issue will continue from those sectors. Yet opposition to NAFTA renegotiation is very strong here too.

Can labor, farmers and others in all three NAFTA countries unite to force a renegotiation of NAFTA? Yes, but there are some obstacles to overcome.

In the United States, demagogues have played with the concern about jobs going to Mexico to whip up anti-Mexican feeling. Combining agitation against NAFTA with insults against the Mexican people plays directly into the hands of NAFTA’s monopoly supporters. We must be clear that NAFTA hurts workers and poor farmers in all three countries, and only benefits the monopolies. Cross-border working class and mass unity is the only way to achieve a renegotiation of NAFTA.

In the United States, a coherent approach to fighting for NAFTA renegotiation will come from organized labor, from smaller-scale farmers, from environmentalists, and also from the immigrant rights movement, the most advanced sectors of which have adopted the goal of renegotiating NAFTA because of the pact’s role in forcing people out of Mexico.

A trinational parliamentary working group on NAFTA renegotiation was started this spring by Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D-Ohio), Canadian Member of Parliament Peter Julian (New Democratic Party), and Mexican federal Senator Yeidckol Polevnsky (PRD). An April 28, 2008, statement from this group indicates a propitious beginning:

“The harsh truth that Bush, Harper and Calderon won’t face is that during the 14 years of NAFTA, the citizens of our three countries have faced growing inequality and stagnating wages. In the case of Mexico the collapse of opportunity has been so severe that out-migration to the United States has more than doubled to an all-all time high of 500,000 people per year. The poor and the middle class have borne the brunt of the damage and dislocation, while the richest few concentrate unprecedented levels of wealth.”

That statement encapsulates the potential for a unified struggle to renegotiate NAFTA; it is up to us to drive home the message.

Emile Schepers is an immigrant rights activist.

Another bank draws worker anger: Teamsters picket KeyBank for funding union-busting

from: PWW

Author: Rick Nagin
People's Weekly World Newspaper, 12/22/08 17:41



CLEVELAND — Teamsters and supporters from Jobs with Justice and Working America picketed the corporate headquarters of KeyBank here Dec. 19, accusing the bank of funding a union-busting drive by Oak Harbor Freight Lines.

The action was in solidarity with some 600 drivers in the 13th week of a very tough strike in Washington, Oregon and Idaho.

The company, one of the largest and most profitable freight haulers on the West Coast, has hired scabs, cancelled retirees’ health care and violated U.S. labor law, the union charged.

“We are here today because KeyBank is underwriting this rogue company,” said Frank Burdell, president of Teamsters Local 407, representing truckers in the Cleveland area. In addition, he said, the bank is getting $2.5 billion from the Troubled Asset Recovery Program (TARP) — the $700 billion bailout approved by Congress.

“That money is supposed to provide relief to those hardest hit in this economy, but instead they are using it to buy other banks and subsidize union-busting,” the union leader said.

After over a year of fruitless bargaining for a new contract, the Teamsters struck Sept. 22 when the company bypassed the union and tried to negotiate directly with the workers — a violation of labor law, Burdell said. The Teamsters have filed charges with the National Labor Relations Board and are awaiting a decision.

Al Hobart, West Coast vice president of the Teamsters, called the company’s actions “the most intrusive I’ve been associated with” in 33 years as a union representative, according to a story in the Puget Sound Business Journal distributed at the rally. He said the dispute is at “the top of the heap” of national labor disputes.

To draw attention to the fight, Teamsters members on Oct. 21 rappelled down the side of a building next to the San Francisco headquarters of Gap, Inc., the clothing retailer, which was using Oak Harbor for deliveries. Since then Gap, as well as other big retail customers and the state of Washington have stopped using the company.

As demonstrators here chanted “Hey, hey, ho, ho — corporate greed has got to go,” Nakeisha Gibson, a member of Working America, wearing a pig mask and a tuxedo jacket, made mock attempts to put her hand in their pockets and steal purses.

Similar actions were held in Buffalo, Indianapolis, Detroit, Portland and Seattle.

Thursday, December 18, 2008

‘Biggest bill for working class people in 30 years’

from: PWW
Author: Rick Nagin
People's Weekly World Newspaper, 12/18/08 07:19

CLEVELAND — The Employee Free Choice Act, aimed at eliminating barriers to workers seeking union representation, is key to any meaningful economic recovery, speakers told more than 100 labor and community activists at a forum here Dec. 16. The forum, sponsored by the North Shore AFL-CIO, was held at Trinity Cathedral in response to a Dec. 5 conference opposing the bill held by the Greater Cleveland Partnership, the local branch of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

The Chamber, spearheading a national campaign against the bill, has raised over $200 million for the battle, which it calls “Armageddon,” Frank Snyder of the national AFL-CIO said.

But, said Michael Ettlinger of the Center for American Progress, the opposition to employee free choice is extremely shortsighted.

The economy for working people has been in decline since 2000 with growing poverty and unemployment and declining average incomes. The recession was papered over by artificially raised housing values, but now, with that bubble burst, the economy is in general decline and expected to get worse. Credit, even for routine business operations, has dried up, Ettlinger said, and unless companies regain confidence they can sell their goods and services, the entire economy could collapse.

He praised the programs advocated by President-elect Obama to increase mass purchasing power and create jobs.

“The Employee Free Choice Act in this situation is especially important,” Ettlinger said. We not only need jobs, we need good jobs so that people can buy more than food and shelter.”

“This is not just about unions and workers; this bill would improve the general well-being,” he said. “It is about raising American living standards.”

Higher wages paid to union workers add $1 billion to the Cleveland economy, John Ryan, representing Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), said. But the effect of unions is far greater than that because non-union companies raise wages to meet union standards, he noted. Ryan was previously executive secretary of the North Shore AFL-CIO

“Collective bargaining is key to U.S. prosperity,” he said. “That’s why we need this bill.”

Given the well-funded and organized opposition, it will take a big effort to enact the bill, but with Obama and bigger majorities in both houses of Congress, including some Republicans backing it, it could be approved, he said.

In fact, according to David Eckstein, national AFL-CIO assistant director for organizing, labor is hopeful the bill will be an integral part of Obama’s recovery package and is working for it to be adopted in the House in March and in the Senate in May. Speaking at this month’s meeting of delegates to the North Shore labor federation, Eckstein called the Employee Free Choice Act “the biggest bill for working class people in 30 years” and said the labor movement intends to campaign for it in the same way it worked for the election of Obama.

Wednesday, December 17, 2008

End the auto crisis: Public ownership to save jobs and environment

from: PWW/CPUSA

Author: Communist Party USA, www.cpusa.org
People's Weekly World Newspaper, 12/17/08 10:35


The following is a statement of the Communist Party USA

Union auto workers are fighting for their lives. For us the fight to defend the United Auto Workers union (UAW) and its members is immediate. It is estimated that over three million jobs are linked to the jobs at GM, Ford and Chrysler: including workers in parts supply, dealerships, steel, rubber, and many other supporting industries. Bankruptcy would have devastating effects on communities where these workers live. Whole regions rely on their purchasing power and the loss of taxes for local and state governments would cause an even bigger crisis. Bankruptcy will also destroy the pensions and healthcare for millions of retirees.

We join with labor and all its allies in demanding immediate action by the federal government to guarantee the loans needed to save these jobs. We are actively engaged in the growing fight to build solidarity and support for the burning demands of the workers and their union.

Even if/when bridge loans are given to the Big Three, the companies have announced there will be further plant closings and say they will permanently shed tens of thousands of their workforce. They do this while continuing to move production out of the country. GM has manufacturing operations in 32 countries around the world. And while the auto companies complain about competition from lower wage countries, they in turn threaten workers in Mexico, Thailand, South America and elsewhere to accept low wages as a condition of work.

Everything unions have fought for throughout our history is being challenged. Republican senators are demanding that unionized workers tear-up their union contracts and work for non-union rates. A forced bankruptcy would destroy the contracts of the UAW. Automotive jobs have been a pathway to a better life for all working people and their loss would hit African American and Latino workers particularly hard. Black workers in particular are more concentrated in auto than other industries.

To solve the economic crisis we need to put more money, not less, into the hands of working people. Republican attempts to force the UAW to take cuts will increase the wage gap; it is a continuation of Republican trickledown economics that voters rejected in the November election. These are the same economic policies that created the present economic crisis. It would lower the purchasing power of auto workers and would create a downward wage pressure on all workers

If we agree that the auto industry is too important to fail, both in terms of our nation's transportation needs and the need to move away from reliance on fossil fuels, then it is too important to be left in the hands of the CEO's.

And at the same time, given the overall economic crisis and the underlying failures of unbridled corporate greed and mismanagement, it is the time to look at more basic solutions also. Demands for public and government oversight raise the issue of democratic public ownership of the domestic auto industry.

The United States government could buy all the common shares of stock in General Motors for less than $3 billion. The worth of the companies is less than the aid they want from taxpayers. If the public provides the capital, why do decisions remain in private hands? Representatives from the unions, from engineers employed in the industry, from government, and the communities and states where the plants are located, are best able to make the key decisions. Representatives from management itself should have input but not control.

We have an economic crisis, but we also have a crisis of the environment and the two are interlinked. We face global catastrophe and the profits before nature philosophy of the auto executives is a major roadblock for building a "green," sustainable industry.

Cities all over the country are looking at the need for mass transit: from rail to subways, and buses. Public demand for environment friendly cars is also growing. We should demand that unemployed auto workers in Detroit and Michigan are put to work building all of the above.

Public ownership can work! From our postal service, to social security, to our public school system, Medicare, police, fire, and military, public ownership has been successful. In the early 70's the government took over a rail system in crisis, fixed it and then years later sold it to private owners at a profit.

The changes needed in our infrastructure to build and sustain the environmentally friendly cars of the future will require public money so why should the ownership of the companies remain in private hands?

In addition:

* We need to pass the Employee Free Choice Act to spur union organizing and to increase the wages and buying power of working people.
* We need National Health care, pass HR 676 – health care is a human right and it should be removed as a bargaining chip.
* We need an international minimum wage to stop the whipsawing of workers from one country to another.
* We need a law to stop tax breaks for companies that outsourcing our jobs.
* We need to get behind President-Elect Barack Obama's economic stimulus and public works jobs program.

Ultra-right pushes Canada into political crisis

from: PWW

Author: Johan Boyden
People's Weekly World Newspaper, 12/16/08 14:18



Canada has been thrown into a period of intense political volatility as the three opposition parties in Parliament have rejected the governing ultra-right Conservative Party’s “mini-budget” response to September’s economic meltdown, and announced the formation of a coalition government ready to take power. Parliament is now suspended until January.

The crisis was sparked by the government’s fiscal update, on November 27, just a few days after Parliament reconvened from a Federal election where Steven Harper’s Conservatives were returned to power again holding a minority of the seats in Parliament.

Harper’s previous term was marked by a close affiliation with the Bush regime on most issues such as foreign policy, energy and democratic rights. Since their election in 2006, the Conservatives have accelerated the previous neo-liberal policies of the Liberals, implementing an agenda of privatization, cutbacks, deregulation, and militarization, and extending Canada’s involvement in the war in Afghanistan.

Canada has also seen record job losses with hundreds of thousands lay-offs in forestry and manufacturing. 70,000 jobs were lost in November alone.

Far from trying to remedy the situation, the Conservative’s called for a continuation of neo-liberal policies in their fiscal update, which did not included a significant ‘bail-out’ package for the economy, and instead severely constricted public servants right to strike and limited their pay, privatized public assets, attacked pay equity, and canceled the Party Financing Act, upon which the opposition parties largely depend for funding.

The mini-budget has been widely condemned by labor and progressives. “How does taking away public employee’s right to strike stimulate the economy?” asked Ken Georgetti, president of the Canadian Labour Congress. Hours after the budget statement, the opposition parties made a surprise announcement that they would bring down the government and form a coalition.

Under Canada’s Parliamentary system, any party (or coalition) that can obtain the confidence of the house – through a majority vote on a “confidence motion” such as a budget bill – can ask the Governor General as the Queen’s representative to form a government. A coalition government at the Federal level is very unusual in Canadian Parliamentary history.

The proposed coalition would bring together the right-of-centre Liberals and the smaller centre-left New Democratic Party. The NDP would hold six ministerial seats within a twenty-four member cabinet. The coalition would not include the Bloc Québécois, which advocates for the sovereignty of Quebec people, but will receive their support on confidence motions for eighteen months.

The formation of a coalition has been enthusiastically welcomed by labor and progressive movements as a vehicle to remove the ultra-right Conservatives. Although there has been wide-spread debate on the left about the social democratic NDP partnering with the big business Liberals, tens of thousands of Canadians rallied in major cities in support of the coalition this past week.

In what is widely regarded as a desperate bid for power, the Conservatives have now dropped most points of their financial update and successfully asked the Governor General to suspend parliament until January, when they will put forward a new budget. They have also launched a desperate public-relations war.

Harper’s efforts have included buying TV ads, trying to shift public opinion with scare-tactics claiming that the coalition is anti-democratic, and by red-baiting the NDP as socialists (rather ridiculously since that party dropped its socialist “baggage” twenty years ago).

Disturbingly, the Conservative’s have also launched one of the most hostile attacks on the Québécois in recent years, characterizing the coalition as dealing with dangerous “separatists” in a negative appeal to the some of the worst sentiments of English-speaking Canada.

Harper’s attack has been seen as an affront by the Quebec people, who have long-standing grievances around the Canadian government’s failure to recognize their national status and right to self-determination. Even Quebec’s right-wing Liberal premier has criticized the Conservative’s comments as inflammatory. During the last election the Conservatives Party was most noticeably set-back in Quebec. Support for the coalition is also strongest there.

It remains to be seen whether the coalition will hold together, however, over the holidays. This week the largest party in the coalition, the Liberals, suddenly dumped their unpopular leader Stephan Dion, forcing his resignation on Monday. The Liberals are posed to replace him with right-wing and hawkish Micheal Ignatieff, as the other main contenders withdrew from the race the next day. Ignatieff is luke-warm about the coalition.

Either way, as Canadian journalist Naomi Klein said in a recent interview, “January [could see] a deeply chastened Harper… Best case scenario, we leverage his overreach, his attempt to use a crisis to push through his ideological pro-corporate agenda, to have a deeper democracy in our country.”

Any coalition government “would be highly susceptible to public pressure, and would open new doors to win pro-people policies” the Communist Party of Canada said in a recent statement, adding that “labour, Aboriginal peoples, youth and students, women, and other people’s movements and organizations will need to intensify extra-parliamentary mobilizations to demand real and immediate action from any new government.”

If Harper is not replaced in January, it seems likely the movement for the Conservative’s defeat will grow rapidly in a spring that now holds new possibilities.

Sunday, December 14, 2008

Economic stimulus in China and the U.S. (Part 2)

From: PWW

Author: Wadi'h Halabi
People's Weekly World Newspaper, 12/12/08 14:03



(Part 2)

China has announced a 2-year, $568 billion program to deal with economic and social problems caused by the global economic crisis. The program includes investment in education and health care, environmental protection, housing, highways and rail transportation, and other infrastructure projects. China’s plan, and the ways in which it helps workers in the U.S., were discussed last week in Part I of this article.

The contrast between China’s approach and that of capitalist countries was highlighted in side-by-side articles on China and India in a recent Wall Street Journal. In India, “the credit crisis is delaying building by crimping the flow of cash for roads, ports and power plants,” the Journal reports. “Billions in infrastructure projects could be in jeopardy…. Interest rates on project financing have soared, banks are reluctant to lend, and investors are sitting on their cash. But the Indian government can’t afford to compensate with a huge infrastructure-spending program like China’s… Countries around the world are shutting down such projects…”

What accounts for the difference between China and India – and most capitalist countries? China and India are both large, populous nations that, since World War II, have been trying to emerge from a legacy of colonial and imperial domination by foreign powers. China is the product of a socialist revolution, while India has remained capitalist, fully embracing the unregulated, neoliberal model of global capitalism that came to dominate most of the world – including the United States — in the 1990s.

The economies of China and India are organized in fundamentally different ways, to serve fundamentally different interests. In all economies, factories, stores and other enterprises produce a surplus — their income from selling goods or services is greater than their expenses. In capitalist countries, most of this surplus goes as profit to the shareholders, bondholders and top executives, who use it as they see fit. But in China, which was formed by the socialist revolution, the state controls most of the surplus, and can direct it to meet human needs, including for jobs, as China’s latest stimulus package shows.

By contrast, in capitalist countries the state serves the interests of the capitalists, who control most of the surplus created by workers. The emphasis of the state and capitalists is on protecting profits, and the exploiters’ power.

Another Wall Street Journal article lays it out. “China’s banks, still largely under state ownership, will be expected to play their part in supporting the Chinese economy, rather than pulling up the drawbridge, as their foreign counter-parts have been doing... If that means earnings are pinched, few in Beijing will mind.” Contrast that with the Wall Street banks that are using bailout money to maintain investor dividends and executive salaries, instead of supporting the U.S. economy (and people) with student, consumer and business loans.

“Can China save the world?” This is the question recently posed on the cover of The Economist. The short answer is – No. But together, China and the workers of the world, our parties and unions, can “save the world,” both socially and environmentally, and we share a common interest in doing so. By contrast, the capitalists’ only interest is their profits and power, regardless of the cost to humanity.

The unfolding capitalist crisis at bottom is a crisis of “overproduction” (more, much more has been produced than the capitalists can sell at a profit) and simultaneously a crisis of unmet human needs, even for food and water. The crisis is pointing to tremendous deepening of poverty, political breakdowns and wars.

But the unity and common struggle of workers and our organizations, including the Chinese and other states formed by workers’ revolutions, Communist and workers’ parties, and trade unions internationally, can “save the world” — and bring extraordinary liberation to all of humanity.

econ4ppl@ cpusa.org

Friday, December 12, 2008

CARTOON: Democracy


from: PWW
Author: Fred Wright
People's Weekly World Newspaper, 12/05/08 15:39


Republic sit-in ends, workers declare victory!

from: PWW
Author: John Bachtell

People's Weekly World Newspaper, 12/11/08 11:44



CHICAGO — Workers occupying Republic Windows and Doors declared victory after they unanimously voted to approve a settlement reached after three days of negotiations with the company and Bank of American, its chief creditor.

“The occupation is over,” said Armando Robles, United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers Local (UE) 1110 president. “We have achieved victory. We said we will not go until we got justice and we have it.” UE represents the 250 production workers at the plant.

The settlement totals $1.75 million and provides workers with eight weeks of pay, two months of continued health coverage and accrued and unused vacation pay. Money from Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase, which owns 40% of the company, will be placed in a separate fund to administer the payments.

"This is about more than just money, said UE Western Region President Carl Rosen. "It's about what can be achieved when workers organize and stand up for justice."

The workers weren’t able to save the plant, which will close. However, UE Director of Organization Bob Kingsley announced the creation of a new foundation dedicated to reopening the plant starting with seed money from the UE national union and the thousands of dollars of donations to UE Local 1110's Solidarity Fund that have come in from across the country and around the world. The fund will be called the “Window of Opportunity Fund.”

The occupation started Dec. 5 when it was shut down after the company’s main financier, Bank of America, refused to extend a line of credit. The occupation became a symbol of workers across the country struggling with the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression and what’s seen as a failure of the federal bailout of banks and financial institutions. The day the occupation started, the U.S. Labor Department said 533,000 more jobs were lost in November.

The action created a storm of outrage because Bank of America recently received a $25 billion bailout package from the federal government, but decided it wouldn’t go to keep manufacturing operations running. When the company skipped a Dec. 5 meeting with the United Electrical Workers’ union (UE) and Bank of America, the workers unanimously voted to stage a sit-in.

“These workers are to this struggle perhaps what Rosa Parks was to social justice 50 years ago,” the Rev. Jesse Jackson said. “This, in many ways, is the beginning of a larger movement for mass action to resist economic violence.”

The action against some of the most powerful economic forces in the nation generated worldwide solidarity and support including from President-elect Barack Obama, who called the workers’ demands “absolutely right.” Food, money and solidarity messages poured in and area unions, religious and community activists demonstrated daily with the workers.

Many solidarity actions were part of the Jobs with Justice Coalition People’s Bailout Now Week of Actions Dec. 7-13. A group of religious leaders in town for a meeting of Interfaith Workers Justice rallied at the plant Dec. 9.

“We’re here to stand with these workers to support them in their struggle for justice,” Rev. Nelson Johnson told the World. Johnson is co-president and board member of Interfaith Worker Justice and vice-president of the Pulpit Forum in Greensboro, N.C.

“People need to work and this is no time for the banks or the company to betray the interests of the American people who made this [bailout] money available for moments precisely like this one that should directly benefit the workers here,” said Johnson.

The company, maker of vinyl windows for the home construction market, had employed 300 workers at the factory, including 250 unionized production workers, for 45 years. The firm started as a family operation but now the Wall Street behemoths Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase, the nation’s largest bank, have controlling interest in the company.

Republic closed the factory with three days notice when Bank of America refused it a $5 million line of credit. As chief investor, BA has effectively controlled the company’s finances. The abrupt closure clearly violated the federal WARN Act, requiring employers to give 60 days notice of a mass layoff (Illinois state law mandates 75 days) or pay the workers and continue their health benefits for that time.

City, county and state officials called for breaking ties with Bank of America if they don’t release funds so the workers could receive what they were owed. They also called for an investigation into what Bank of America is doing with the bailout funds, perhaps investing in overseas operations but not in the United States.

“The government gave $25 billion to BA. They are supposed to work with businesses to keep them open, not shut them down,” Lalo Munoz, 54, told the World. Munoz, a machine operator, had worked at the plant for 34 years.

Others see the banks and corporations as taking advantage of the financial and economic crisis to break unions, shed worker benefits and pensions. UE spokespersons say Republic, which received millions of dollars in city subsidies, bought a similar plant in Iowa. Speculation is production will be restarted in the non-union Iowa plant. The role of the banks in this decision is not known.

“The workers want Bank of America to keep the plant open and the workers employed,” said UE's Rosen. “There is always a demand for windows and doors. But with Barack Obama’s stimulus proposal, there will be even greater demand for the products made by Republic’s workers. It doesn’t make sense to close this plant when the need is so obvious."

jbachtell @ cpusa.org

AFL-CIO President John Sweeney issues statement in support of striking Chicago factory workers

from: PWW

Author: Special to the World
People's Weekly World Newspaper, 12/09/08 15:56



The 10 million members of the AFL-CIO stand in solidarity with over 200 members of the United Electrical Workers who, in championing their own rights, are taking on the rampant corporate abuse of workers across this country during dire economic times. These workers' peaceful occupation of the shuttered Republic Windows and Doors plant in Chicago has put Washington and Wall Street on notice that working people have had enough. We applaud President-elect Barack Obama's support for the workers' demands to receive the vacation time and severance pay that they have earned. Republic and its creditors should meet immediately with these workers to honor their reasonable demands.

Our nation cannot afford to bail out banks and investment firms while leaving workers behind. Only weeks after taking $25 billion in federal bailout money, Bank of America has refused to extend a line of credit to Republic, preventing the workers from either keeping their jobs or receiving severance pay. Bank of America's deplorable behavior is but one symptom of a financial industry that sets its bottom line above the heads of working people. Like so many Wall Street titans, Bank of America took billions in government handouts on the premise that they would extend credit to businesses so that working people could keep their jobs. The striking workers at the Republic plant are rightfully holding them to their promise.

No worker should have to face the loss of his or her job with three days' notice, especially in the midst of the holiday season. As millions of our fellow Americans struggle to make ends meet this winter without a job, Congress cannot afford to remain complacent any longer. Working families are in urgent need of a major jobs-producing economic stimulus now. If our leaders are serious about saving the middle class, then we need an economic agenda that will support good, green jobs like the ones at Republic and hold our financial institutions accountable for their actions.

Barack Obama on the side of workers occupying factory

from: PWW

Author: John Wojcik
People's Weekly World Newspaper, 12/08/08 12:24



Melvin Maklin, one of the sit in strikers at Republic Windows brings out chants of, “Yes We Can” when he tells the crowd, “We have a new president. He says, Yes we can.” PWW photo by Scott Marshall.
CHICAGO — As news of workers occupying the Republic Windows and Doors factory here spread across the nation Dec. 7, President-elect Barack Obama came out on the side of the workers.

“When it comes to the situation here in Chicago with the workers who are asking for their benefits and payments they have earned, I think they are absolutely right. What’s happening to them is reflective of what’s happening across this economy,” he said.

As the occupation continues into its fourth day the union, UE (United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America) Local 1110. is planning to make major announcements here, Dec. 8 at a noon press conference. Several sources in the labor movement say that unions plan to remove funds they have invested with Bank of America from that institution.

The Bank controls Republic Windows and unions are angry because even after being bailed out by tax-payer dollars to the tune of $25 billion, the bank is apparently unwilling to use any of those funds to save jobs for workers. Republic told workers last Tuesday that it would shut down Friday and was unwilling to guarantee that workers would even be paid for the week. The move violated federal law that requires 60 day notice of a plant shut-down or mass lay-offs.

The action has triggered moves in Congress to require banks that take taxpayer bailouts to use that money to benefit workers.

Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) demonstrated at the plant Sunday to show support for Local 1110 members’ demands that the company and its chief creditor, Bank of America, meet their obligations to pay their 300 workers. She said she supported efforts by Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.) to negotiate an agreement. Schakowsky said she will work with Gutierrez and other members of Congress to get the Treasury Department to require banks that have taken taxpayer financing to use those funds to benefit workers.

The Rev. Jesse Jackson also went to the plant Sunday to deliver food to the workers. “These workers are to this struggle perhaps what Rosa Parks was to social justice 50 years ago,” Jackson said. “This, in many ways, is the beginning of a larger movement for mass action to resist economic violence.”

The workers were laid off Friday when the plant was officially closed after a decision by Bank of America to cut off operating credit to the company. The bank even refused to authorize the release of money needed to pay workers their earned vacation pay, and compensation they are owed under the federal Warn Act because they were not given the legally-required notice that the plant was about to close.

“The bank has the money,” said Mark Meinster, a spokesman for the union, “and we are demanding that Bank of America release the money owed to workers who have earned it and are entitled to it. We’re occupying the plant to guard its assets and keep everything safe.” He said the workers plan to stay inside until they are paid and that they will fight for the possibility of keeping it open.

When Bank of America and other banks were given billions in bail-outs, the union says, the public was told that the money was needed to keep credit flowing and prevent loss of jobs. The bank, the union says, by cutting its line of credit to Republic, forced the closing of a plant where workers were, at least up until Friday, producing energy-efficient doors and windows.

John Wojcik (jwojcik@ pww.org) is labor editor of the People's Weekly World.

Update

Meanwhile, it was announced Dec. 8 that a move is underway to stop the city of Chicago from doing any business with the Bank of America.

15 aldermen are introducing an ordinance to require the city to cease all business connections with the bank.

“It is outrageous for the bank to cut off credit, a company’s livelihood, after receiving billions in taxpayer money,” said Alderman Joe Moore (49th Ward)..

“It’s not only unfair to workers, but also Bank of America is thumbing its nose at Congress,” declared Tom Balanoff, president of SEIU’s Local 6.

Solidarity pours in for Chicago workers occupying factory, Obama says demands are 'absolutely right'

from: PWW

Author: John Bachtell
People's Weekly World Newspaper, 12/07/08 21:20



John Bachtell
Republic workers and their supporters unload a truck of food delivered by Rainbow Push coalition.
CHICAGO (Updated) – Solidarity is pouring in for 250 workers who have been sitting-in for three days at Republic Windows and Doors, including from President-elect Barack Obama. The company closed abruptly Dec. 5 because Bank of America, its chief investor, refused to extend a $5 million line of credit. BA recently received a $25 billion bailout from the federal government.

The workers are owed $1.6 million in vacation and severance pay and health benefits the company refuses to pay. They started sitting in Dec. 5 after the company didn’t show for a meeting with the union and BA.

“When it comes to the situation here in Chicago with the workers who are asking for their benefits and payments they have earned, I think they are absolutely right,” Obama said Dec. 7 while announcing his new Veterans Affairs director. “What’s happening to them is reflective of what’s happening across this economy.”

John Bachtell
Rev. Jesse Jackson exits Republic Windows and Doors after meeting with workers.
The National Rainbow PUSH Coalition led by Rev. Jesse Jackson delivered a truck of food for the workers Dec. 7. A line of union and community activists joined the workers in passing the food into the factory where it was divided up.

Jackson told the angry workers it was “wrong to bail out the banks and not the workers” and hailed their courage and example for the labor movement. “You have followed in the great tradition of Dr. King, Cesar Chavez and Rosa Parks to fight until some answer comes,” he said.

Jackson noted there has been “too much silence and not enough resistance for too long. Workers need to start to show resistance to fight for jobs, health care and justice.”

“If workers don’t take a stand we’ll all be out of a job,” Robert Simpson, president of Chicago Coalition of Black Trade Unionists told the World. “We in CBTU have been saying this for years. It’s about showing some solidarity and coming together to keep these jobs.”

Simpson added, “It would be a big mistake if we didn’t do something to save the auto industry – saving millions of jobs, health care and pensions, the whole nine yards. It’s time for the labor movement to come together.”

Simpson said he thought the action by the workers and the solidarity they were getting “sends a signal of concern to the incoming Obama administration of what’s happening out here. He saw for himself during the campaign the suffering people were enduring. We are fighting for things he has said he will do. The people will be supporting him.”

James Thindwa, director of Chicago Jobs with Justice told the World the failure of Republic and Bank of America was an important lesson, “If the free market is failing, then workers need to run the plants.”

“We are very heartened by the wonderful acts of solidarity,” said Luis Lira, who was standing security at the factory entrance. Lira, 39, has been working at Republic for 16 years. “It’s surprised us. We never thought we would get all this support from the rest of the world.”

John Bachtell
Republic workers Ron Bender (right) and Donald White (center) talk to a third worker who had come with food and solidarity. The unnamed worker had also gone through a plant closing.
Meanwhile many of the workers, who are represented by United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America (UE), feel the company has ulterior motives for shutting the plant down. Ron Bender, a second shift worker noted Republic held “monthly town hall meetings to communicate with the workers. These ended in August and then they started removing equipment and materials from the factory.”

“A few weeks ago the removed an entire production line. Today it’s in storage in a lot on the south side. We want to know why they did this,” said Bender.

The workers are determined to stay until they get everything owed to them. Donald White said, “With all the publicity, we hope it’s a wake up call to all the companies. We need to give workers more power and maybe we can keep our jobs.”

Tuesday, December 9, 2008

Russia communists slam authorities, call for U.S.S.R. revival

From: The Russian News and Information Agency



Russia communists slam authorities, call for U.S.S.R. revival

17:06 | 29/ 11/ 2008

MOSCOW, November 29 (RIA Novosti) - Communist leader Gennady Zyuganov criticized the Russian leadership's domestic policies on Saturday and said communism was the only remedy for the current financial crisis.

Speaking at a Communist Party congress, Zyuganov said the Kremlin has been promising too much, while doing too little.

"The ruling grouping has not achieved any noticeable success, nor does it have any action plan. It has been guided by the sole goal - to stay in power at any cost," Zyuganov said.

Zyuganov said the global credit crisis has shown that the collapse of capitalism is inevitable.

"It is increasingly obvious that socialism is not a product of propaganda, but a natural and unavoidable phase of development. The collapse of the speculative financial market is a turning point," he said.

Zyuganov regretted Russia's "tragic breakup" with former Soviet republics and called for restoring the Soviet Union, which he said is quite possible. The renationalization of the country's mining, energy and other "strategic" sectors is "the key task," he said.

A program of reviving Russia that the party leaders set out at the congress also proposed reinstating direct elections of governors as a more democratic method of selecting regional leaders - abolished by then president Vladimir Putin - cutting bureaucracy, and lifting a moratorium on the death penalty for severe crimes.

The leading opposition force in the country, which resisted Putin's return as premier and a recent move to extend the presidential term from four to six years, the communists welcome an alliance with other opposition groups, Zyuganov said.


Monday, December 8, 2008

The media myth: Detroit's $70-an-hour autoworker

From: PWW

Author: Eric Boehlert

People's Weekly World Newspaper, 12/05/08 14:47



From Media Matters: http://mediamatters.org/columns/200811250012?f=h_column

It's been one week since New York Times financial columnist Andrew Ross Sorkin wrote that at General Motors, "the average worker was paid about $70 an hour, including health care and pension costs."

The nugget was part of a column in which Sorkin argued that the government should not bail out the ailing Big Three automakers and that they instead should embrace bankruptcy.

Sorkin's point was that labor costs were out of control -- workers enjoyed "gold-plated benefits" -- and that during bankruptcy, the auto companies could address those runaway wages.

As I mentioned, it's been one week since the column appeared, which seems like plenty of time for Sorkin and the Times to correct the misleading $70-an-hour claim. But to date, there's been no clarification from the newspaper of record or from Sorkin himself.

And he isn't alone. Appearing on NPR last week, Times senior business correspondent Micheline Maynard told listeners that the "hourly wage" of Detroit's union autoworkers had been driven up "towards $80 an hour."

Somebody at the Times needs to clarify the record, because the average United Auto Workers member is not paid $80 an hour. Or even $70. Not even close. Yet (thanks to the Times?) the issue has become a central talking point in the unfolding national debate about the future of America's automotive industry.

Indeed, that $70-an-hour meme, actively promoted by the anti-union conservative media, has ricocheted around the traditional press as well as the political landscape, where it was picked up by congressional critics last week during hearings and used to argue against aiding GM, Ford, and Chrysler.

For the record, I'm not from Michigan, and I don't have friends or family members who work in the auto or auto-supply business. And honestly, I think there are compelling arguments on both sides of the question about whether to bail out the U.S. auto industry. So I'm genuinely torn on the issue. But what's obvious to me is that it's harmful to public discourse when the press, on such a central issue facing our country, fails to clearly state the facts and instead perpetuates misinformation with sloppy reporting -- reporting that seems to hold blue-collar workers to a different standard than their white-collar counterparts.

Last week, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) announced that automotive executives should return to Washington in coming weeks to "make their case, to the Congress and the American people," for a federal bailout. And as Times columnist and Nobel Prize winner for economics Paul Krugman wrote recently, "[M]aybe letting the auto companies die is the right decision, even though an auto industry collapse would be a huge blow to an already slumping economy. But it's a decision that should be taken carefully" [emphasis added].

But having the media echo conservative misinformation and bandy about urban-myth salary figures about allegedly high-on-the-hog GM workers does not constitute a careful review of the facts.

Question: Is the press just being sloppy on this issue of supposedly pampered autoworkers, or are there other elements in play? Because honestly, I've had trouble escaping the not-very-subtle elitist, get-a-load-of-this tone that has run through the media's misinformation on the topic; i.e., "These autoworkers get paid that?!"

Answer: No, they don't, so please stop reporting it. (And why has the press been so reticent to note that Big Three autoworkers recently made significant concessions to management?)

And it's funny, because I don't remember hearing much coverage in the press about AIG workers' six- and seven-figure salaries when the U.S. government announced it was bailing out the insurance giant. And I haven't seen or heard a single press reference to the annual salaries pocketed by Citigroup employees, even though the government has moved in quickly to bail the banking giant out of a hole its executives dug.

As Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA) pointed out during congressional hearings last week, "There is apparently a cultural condition that's more ready to accept aid to a white-collar industry than the blue-collar industry, and that has to be confronted."

That cultural condition seems to extend to, and be embraced by, today's white-collar press corps.

Make no mistake: The $70-an-hour claim represents a classic case of conservative misinformation. It's also a very dangerous one. The falsehood about autoworkers is being spread at a crucial time, when a make-or-break public debate is taking place, a debate that could affect millions of American workers.

* "Lavish contracts granted to the United Auto Workers, for instance, put GM on the hook for more than $70 an hour per worker." [New York Post]
* "The United Auto Workers are keen on saving their jobs and the $70-an-hour paychecks that go with them." [National Review]
* "[T]here's no reason that a UAW worker should get total compensation of $70 an hour when the average American only makes about $25 an hour in total compensation." [James Gattuso, from the conservative Heritage Foundation, appearing on MSNBC]
* "Given that we're in tough economic times, it's hard for the average American to muster a lot of sympathy for workers at the Big 3 automakers when all of the companies pay out over $70 per hour in wages, pension and health care benefits." [Right Wing News]
* "The bailout as proposed today is a bailout of the UAW; it's not the auto industry. A Big Three worker in Detroit makes $73 an hour if you include all the benefits." [Conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer, appearing on the syndicated television show Inside Washington]
* "Companies at which union workers make $71 an hour in wages and benefits -- compared to just $47 an hour at Toyota's U.S. plants -- are not going to be saved by a $25 billion government check." [Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, writing at Human Events Online]
* "Big Three union workers, with their gold-plated health care plans, make about $73 an hour in total compensation." [Conservative columnist Amanda Carpenter at Townhall.com]
* "When you're paying $73.73 an hour to those people with salary and benefits and your competition is paying $48 to its workers, you're going to get your butt kicked in the marketplace unfortunately." [Conservative radio host Lars Larson]
* "The average Detroit autoworker makes more than $100K each year." [On-screen Fox News graphic]

Let's note that any suggestion in the press that most UAW workers earn, or are paid, $70 an hour is spectacularly dishonest. Period. (As one Daily Kos diarist pointed out last week, according to the UAW website, the base pay for a worker in a UAW plant is about $28 an hour.)

What that $70 figure (or $73) actually represents is what it costs GM in total labor expenses, on an hourly basis, to manufacture autos.

Do you see that there's a big distinction? General Motors doles out $70 an hour in overall labor costs to manufacture cars. But individual employees don't get paid $70 an hour to make cars. (The discrepancy between costs and wages is explained by additional benefits, pension fees, and health-care costs GM pays out to current and retired employees.)

Simply put, GM's labor costs are not synonymous with hourly wages earned by UAW employees. Many in the press have casually used the two interchangeably. But they're not.

Felix Salmon at Portfolio did perhaps the best job explaining the misinformation at play:

The average GM assembly-line worker makes about $28 per hour in wages, and I can assure you that GM is not paying $42 an hour in health insurance and pension plan contributions. Rather, the $70 per hour figure (or $73 an hour, or whatever) is a ridiculous number obtained by adding up GM's total labor, health, and pension costs, and then dividing by the total number of hours worked. In other words, it includes all the healthcare and retirement costs of retired workers. [emphasis in original]

Indeed, according to this Associated Press report, a chunk of GM's $70-an-hour labor costs goes toward paying current retirees' pensions and health-care coverage. In other words, that's money that's not going to end up in the pocket of any autoworker when he cashes his paycheck this week. That's money GM has to set aside in order to pay off costs associated with workers already in retirement. That money has absolutely nothing to do with calculating the hourly wage of a full-time UAW employee today. None.

So, no, UAW workers don't make $70 an hour even if you factor in benefits, because a portion of those benefits are going to people who retired years ago.

Nonetheless, that formulation (wages+benefits=$70 an hour) has been widespread. That's what Sorkin did in his Times column: "The average worker was paid about $70 an hour, including health care and pension costs."

Not only is that inaccurate, but there's also a problem in terms of perception. It's true that autoworkers don't earn annual salaries and that when calculating hourly wages, the cost of benefits paid directly to the worker can be included. But some media outlets have been so casual and sloppy in presenting the facts that news consumers are left with the false impression that GM workers pocket $70 an hour. That's not true, and it seems some in the press are doing very little to correct that misperception.

For instance, BusinessWeek also used the same convoluted language: "Older UAW members make more than $70 per hour in combined wages and benefits." Dallas Morning News columnist Cheryl Hall did it, too: "GM's average worker makes $78.21 an hour in wages and benefits."

Why does the press use that convoluted equation when calculating how much autoworkers supposedly make?

I have a hunch it's because that $70 an hour is a real eyepopper. It makes a very deep impression within the space of just a few words.

I'm sure everybody understood the $70-an-hour implication in Sorkin's column, especially since he also lamented the "gold-plated benefits" UAW workers enjoyed. (They were "off the charts," he stressed.) And since it's harder to back up a claim of gold-plated benefits by citing the actual hourly wage of UAW workers ($28), Sorkin went with the $70 figure, along with completely nebulous language about "health care and pension costs."

The takeaway from Sorkin's column was quite clear: GM is mismanaged, and its workers are wildly overpaid.

By the way, here's the right way to cover the issue: In a November 18 column, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch's David Nicklaus wrote that the Big Three "need to bring their labor costs, which average $72 an hour, closer to the Honda or Toyota level of about $45." Note how Nicklaus never implied that labors costs equaled take-home wages. Why? Because they don't. (And kudos to Washington Post business columnist Steven Pearlstein, who refuses to use the $70-an-hour figure because it's so misleading.)

How much money GM's workers make is certainly relevant when discussing the unfolding automotive crisis. But the press should stop confusing the issue, and tainting the perceptions of news consumers, by casually suggesting that $70-an-hour labor costs represent what UAW workers pocket every 60 minutes.

That's misleading and dishonest.

And that's why it's still not too late for Sorkin and the Times to correct the record.